@Paul, I agree that waterway=river and route=ferry are incorrect and that route=ferry is slightly less so <g>.
But do you mean the untagged ways should be tagged with route=canoe as someone else suggested, or that the entire relation should be tagged that way? On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 9:48 AM Paul Allen <[email protected]> wrote: > On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 6:22 PM, Dave Swarthout <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> A closer look at some similar relations (thanks, Kevin) indicates others >> have had the same issue and resolved it in various ways. One person left >> the water-crossing ways untagged, as I did, another used waterway=river to >> mark them, another used route=ferry (both incorrect for my situation). >> > > Untagged is undesirable. Could be anything. Footpath in an area prone to > heave flooding. Ley line. Anything. :) > > Waterway=river is just plain wrong. > > Route=ferry is also wrong, but not quite as wrong as the others. It's a > step in the right direction. As the old joke goes, > now we're just haggling over money. > > Route=canoe is the right way to go, I think. It may not render at present > (I haven't checked) but the carto guys may > decide to render it at some point in the future. Factors in the decision > will be how often it is used and if it serves a > useful purpose. > > -- > Paul > > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
