On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I agree that waterway=river and route=ferry are incorrect and that > route=ferry is slightly less so <g>. > If you register your canoe as a merchant vessel and pay yourself for the trip, it's a ferry! > > But do you mean the untagged ways should be tagged with route=canoe as > someone else suggested, or that the entire relation should be tagged that > way? > Both. Route=ferry is used on ways (and renders). The individual ways are gathered into relations. Currently your route=canoe relation has footpaths and untagged ways. I think (I could be wrong) that it should consist of footpaths and ways tagged with route=canoe. Try it and see what happens. Probably nothing, but at least it makes a little more sense when interpreting the relation: "footpath, canoe route, footpath, canoe route" rather than "footpath, unknown, footpath, unknown." If it's valid to use route=ferry for ways on open water (it is) then it's almost as valid to use route=canoe for ways on open water. Slightly less valid because route=ferry is documented https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:route but route=canoe is not, however that page says "If used on ways, route describes a route which is not linked to a physical object like streets or rails. This applies for [...] ships on open water [...] airplanes." So it's valid. Might not be rendered (yet) but valid. Or, at the very minimum, not obviously wrong. -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
