While page is not the best... you seem to misunderstand part of it. The "level" reference doesn't have anything to do the level tag. Or any tag at all. It's just saying there are 3 levels of detail at which a golf course can be mapped.
As for the "How short is the grass" section, while maybe not expressed in the best way, that looks generally correct to me. golf=green or golf=tee_area has the shortest grass nobody seems to map golf=fringe or golf=apron, so these should probably go golf=fairway is slightly longer than the green, but still well maintained golf=mown is hardly used, can probably go golf=rough is the longer grass outside the fairway, it generally is still mowed, but noticeable longer natural=scrub is for areas that are generally not longer mowed, so you get very long grass, some shrubs, ... natural=wood, well, there are trees here landuse=forest has no meaningful difference to natural=wood in this context and can go. Generally speaking, you have areas for green, tee and fairway (green and tee are NOT inside the fairway), surrounded by rough, surrounded by scrub and/or wood. > -----Original Message----- > From: Warin <[email protected]> > Sent: Saturday, 14 July 2018 13:44 > To: Tag discussion, strategy and related tools > <[email protected]> > Subject: [Tagging] Golf wiki page > > Hi > > I have just come across a new mapper trying to map a golf course. > Fine, but they can do with some guidance. > Looking around for such guidance I came across this wiki page, > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/HOWTO_map_a_golf_course_2013 > > Looks to me .. well not the best. > The idea that the level tag should be used in that way .. umm as a > how to ? Err I'd vote no. > Remember this is for new people too. > > The idea that the height of the grass should be tagged in that way ?? > Again .. no. > > The page does not link to the golf wiki pages. > > I think it can do with a major rewrite, or should I just make a new > page ? HOWTO_map_a_golf_course_v2 ?? :) Once done and people make > their comments/changes then the original page can have a redirection > to the newer page? > I think a new page would probably be better as a fresh approach can > be had. > > Thoughts? > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
