You should pay attention to the message format, the last one is unreadable.
Le 14 juillet 2018 10:57:07 GMT+02:00, [email protected] a écrit : >From: Warin <[email protected]> >Sent: Saturday, 14 July 2018 17:07 >To: [email protected] >Subject: Re: [Tagging] Golf wiki page > > > >On 14/07/18 15:11, [email protected] ><mailto:[email protected]> wrote: > >While page is not the best... you seem to misunderstand part of it. > >The "level" reference doesn't have anything to do the level tag. Or any >tag at all. It's just saying there are 3 levels of detail at which a >golf course can be mapped. > >In which case a different word can be used .. like 'order'. > >I didn’t write the page. I’m just saying you misinterpreted the use of >the word “level”. The term “level of detail” is pretty common and means >exactly what whoever authored that page is talking about. > > >As for the "How short is the grass" section, while maybe not expressed >in the best way, that looks generally correct to me. > >Why not use height? already exists and is understandable by all. > > > >golf=green or golf=tee_area has the shortest grass >nobody seems to map golf=fringe or golf=apron, so these should probably >go >golf=fairway is slightly longer than the green, but still well >maintained >golf=mown is hardly used, can probably go >golf=rough is the longer grass outside the fairway, it generally is >still mowed, but noticeable longer >natural=scrub is for areas that are generally not longer mowed, so you >get very long grass, some shrubs, ... >natural=wood, well, there are trees here >landuse=forest has no meaningful difference to natural=wood in this >context and can go. > >Generally speaking, you have areas for green, tee and fairway (green >and tee are NOT inside the fairway), surrounded by rough, surrounded by >scrub and/or wood. > > >Grooming is used for piste and may possibly be applied here. >https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:piste:grooming > >Comment: not all golf courses have grass... >http://www.cooberpedygolfclub.com.au/ >where "greens are black and the fairways are white" >So height of the grass cannot be used everywhere. > >Again, it’s not really about the “height of the grass”. Nobody cares >about recording the “height of grass”. > >You have different areas with different meanings. Green and tee area. >Fairway. Rough. (And yes, others, like bunkers [usually sand], and >[usually water] hazards.) It’s just that for the probably 99% of golf >courses that use grass, there is a direct correlation between these >areas and the length of the grass. > >So for non-golfers (which includes me) the description of “If it’s very >short and well maintained, it’s going to be a green or tee. If It’s >slightly longer but still clearly mowed and maintained often, it’s a >fairway. If it’s growing even longer, but still maintained grass, it’s >rough. (And everything else is likely out of bounds)” Is probably >easiest to understand.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
