On 15/07/18 18:56, [email protected] wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Warin <[email protected]>
Sent: Sunday, 15 July 2018 18:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Golf wiki page
Devils advocate hat firmly on.
But what is intended? Not the height of the grass .. but the
'smoothness and regularity' of the playing surface?
I use http://www.cooberpedygolfclub.com.au/ as an example again.
That golf course has no grown grass. They use sand and oil for the
greens. They use artificial grass on the tees.
The difference is the finish on the surfaces .. not the size of
gains of sand nor size of the rocks nor the height of the grass...
I have just finished tagging that golf course .. fairways have
surface=sand, colour=white; greens are surface=sand, colour=black.
Humm I don't remember what I have tagged tees as? Should be
colour=green, surface=artificial_grass and they should be square.
.
I don't have the knowledge to tag the roughs, bunkers and some of
the tees there so it is just a rough start.
All of which is pretty much totally irrelevant.
What you need is
golf=green
golf=tee
golf=fairway
golf=bunker
golf=rough
...
for the appropriate areas.
I apologise for the simplification.
For the 'greens' I have closed ways with the tags
golf=green
colour=black
surface=sand
source=bing
for the fairways I have some simple closed ways and some multipolygon relations
where there is an inner or are inners with the tags
golf=fairway
colour=white
surface=sand
source=bing
and so on.. The intention was to demonstrate that not all golf courses have
grass, have 'greens' that have grass or are green in colour, etc.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
