To my knowledge the maximum current can be quite different and also the system: 
Three-phase electric power vs. single-phase circuit.

I would guess the range for a single household could go from about 2.500W to 
about 25.000W.

> Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2018 um 12:40 Uhr
> Von: seirra <[email protected]>
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Tagging suggestions for electricity
>
> here anyway, the networks are more than happy to show an area map and 
> generally they don't change. as the resident can choose just about any 
> of the energy companies however, that would take a bit of asking around. 
> i've never tried asking companies so perhaps they would give the data 
> out, otherwise it would have to be surveys. voltage and current is 
> usually country wide or in a rather close range? (imagine the difficulty 
> supplying electrical products to consumers otherwise). i'm a little less 
> sure about earthing systems.
> 
> 
> On 08/31/18 10:23, [email protected] wrote:
> > I'm asking myself, how is all the (quite specific) data verifiable on the 
> > ground? Furthermore, don't you need expert knowledge for some things 
> > mentioned, eg. earthing system,  but also the more straight forward things 
> > like voltages and especially currents - who is able to identify the correct 
> > fuses for that?
> >
> > Why do you want to tag these properties? To my opinion, no one needs to 
> > justify tags regarding to usefulness, I'm just curios.
> >
> >> Gesendet: Freitag, 31. August 2018 um 10:17 Uhr
> >> Von: seirra <[email protected]>
> >> An: [email protected]
> >> Betreff: Re: [Tagging] Tagging suggestions for electricity
> >>
> >> yeah that is what i meant. i think they buy it from the network which
> >> serves as a 'middleman' to the generators, because the prices for the
> >> same company and tariff vary depending what network you are in over
> >> here. so presumably they pick and choose their power sources, and then
> >> the network charges them a fee to use them over that network.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 08/31/18 08:57, Warin wrote:
> >>> Here there is the company that I buy my electricity from. They buy it
> >>> from the distribution network that I am connected to.
> >>> So I can have a choice of who I buy from .. but my network does not
> >>> change.
> >>> I am not certain if these firms buy it directly from the network .. or
> >>> some other body that then sees to the network and the power generators
> >>> as separate things.
> >>>
> >>> On 31/08/18 17:43, seirra wrote:
> >>>> just something to mention about distribution companies here anyway,
> >>>> we have the network, then we have the company? so for example my
> >>>> network is UK power network, but my company is utilita? however in
> >>>> other areas (still in the uk) they would have a different network
> >>>> altogether
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On 08/31/18 05:47, Dolly Andriatsiferana wrote:
> >>>>>      I think this would be hard to maintain, and highly redundant
> >>>>>      since voltage won't change for a given city or even country.
> >>>>>      Think about standards names to fill utilities:electricity.
> >>>>>      Each standard comes with frequency, voltage, rating...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yes, I agree that in most cases voltage doesn't change much for a
> >>>>> given city. But something that will change frequently is the source
> >>>>> (here in Madagascar mostly from a distribution company, a generator,
> >>>>> or individual solar panels).
> >>>>> And maybe another good idea is to omit those voltage and possibly
> >>>>> redundant details, and put sources directly as values on the main
> >>>>> tag (like how most of the few existing electricity=* tags seem to be
> >>>>> used). So we would have something like:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>    * utility:electricity=yes - there is electricity feeding the
> >>>>>      building but the source is not defined
> >>>>>    * utility:electricity=no - there is no electricity source at all
> >>>>>    * utility:electricity=generator/company/solar/windmill... - there
> >>>>>      is electricity and the source is known
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2018-08-31 1:47 GMT+03:00 Warin <[email protected]
> >>>>> <mailto:[email protected]>>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      On 31/08/18 05:20, François Lacombe wrote:
> >>>>>>      Le jeu. 30 août 2018 à 19:12, Dolly Andriatsiferana
> >>>>>>      <[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> a
> >>>>>>      écrit :
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>          I like the idea of keeping a namespace gathering utilities
> >>>>>>          such as electricity, gas, internet or other. But the idea
> >>>>>>          is also to be able to use a namespace for the utility to
> >>>>>>          provide more details (source, voltage, fee...) or
> >>>>>>          conditions (if there's schedule in availability) - and with
> >>>>>>          *utility:electricity* this would easily generate a complex
> >>>>>>          tagging of namespace under namespace, unless you say it is
> >>>>>>          no problem to have *utility:electricity:voltage=** for 
> >>>>>> example.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>      I think this would be hard to maintain, and highly redundant
> >>>>>>      since voltage won't change for a given city or even country.
> >>>>>      Most hoses in Australia have 240 v single phase supplied to
> >>>>>      them. Then they have 'standard' (here) GPOs of 10 Amp capacity.
> >>>>>      Some have one or more higher 15 Amp capacity outlets.
> >>>>>      And then there are some houses that have 3 phase 415v supplied
> >>>>>      to them - and they have 'standard' (here) GPOs of 10 Amp
> >>>>>      capacity, possibly one or more 15 Amp capacity outlets and one
> >>>>>      or more 3 phase outlets.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      So here you have in one neighbourhood 3 different instances of
> >>>>>      electricity presence in houses.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>      Agreed with Paul statement about earthing system which is
> >>>>>>      specific to each building
> >>>>>      Earthing systems are usually mandated and common to some
> >>>>>      bureaucratic boundaries.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>      _______________________________________________
> >>>>>      Tagging mailing list
> >>>>>      [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> >>>>>      https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >>>>>      <https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> Tagging mailing list
> >>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> Tagging mailing list
> >>>> [email protected]
> >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> Tagging mailing list
> >>> [email protected]
> >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> Tagging mailing list
> >> [email protected]
> >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> >>
> > _______________________________________________
> > Tagging mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
>

_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to