Why don't you Tage separate relations? Yves
Le 2 septembre 2018 11:02:39 GMT+02:00, Volker Schmidt <[email protected]> a écrit : >There are routes out there that can be used by bicycle and on foot. Up >tp >now I have classified them as one or the or the other, tagging >according to >the prevalent use. This is unsatisfactory and, strictly speaking, not >corresponding to the principle of on-the-ground-truth. > >I would like to distinguish between > > - routes that are exclusively hiking (containing ways that are > off-limits for bicycles) >- routes that are exclusively for cycling (containing ways that are not > suitable for pedestrians) > - routes that are intended for double use > >The formally correct solution is "route=hiking;bicycle", and >network=lwn;lcn ecc >but this tagging is discouraged [1] and is flagged as error by JOSM, >and I >suspect that it also not supported by data users, as it is not >documented >anywhere. >In my part of the world (Northern Italy) we have plenty of mixed-use >routes, which is in most cases already reflected in their name " >percorso >ciclo-pedonale ". > >I suppose that this has been discussed in the past, and apologize if I >did >not find (or forgot) where. > >[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
