Here is a route that is;
a horse riders route
a mtb route
and
a walking route ... It is displayed correctly here
https://hiking.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=176684 as a hiking route
https://riding.waymarkedtrails.org/#route?id=176684 as a horse riders route.
But misses out on the mtb!
Presently tagged
network=nwn
route=mtb;hiking;horse
While the semi colon is discouraged ... these cases appear to be exceptions.
On 02/09/18 19:02, Volker Schmidt wrote:
There are routes out there that can be used by bicycle and on foot. Up
tp now I have classified them as one or the or the other, tagging
according to the prevalent use. This is unsatisfactory and, strictly
speaking, not corresponding to the principle of on-the-ground-truth.
I would like to distinguish between
* routes that are exclusively hiking (containing ways that are
off-limits for bicycles)
* routes that are exclusively for cycling (containing ways that are
not suitable for pedestrians)
* routes that are intended for double use
The formally correct solution is "route=hiking;bicycle", and
network=lwn;lcn ecc
but this tagging is discouraged [1] and is flagged as error by JOSM,
and I suspect that it also not supported by data users, as it is not
documented anywhere.
In my part of the world (Northern Italy) we have plenty of mixed-use
routes, which is in most cases already reflected in their name "
percorso ciclo-pedonale ".
I suppose that this has been discussed in the past, and apologize if I
did not find (or forgot) where.
[1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Semi-colon_value_separator
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
