In public transport: 1 (one) route_master relation for the line
1 or more (typically 2) route relations for the variations in itinerary. Jo Op zo 2 sep. 2018 om 13:59 schreef Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com>: > On Sun, Sep 2, 2018 at 12:41 PM, Jo <winfi...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> You are inverting how route_master relations are used in public >> transport. There the route master represents a line, and our route >> relations represent the itineraries (all the variations). >> > > Variant 1: you can walk. > > Variant 2: you can cycle. > > I don't see how that differs significantly from variant 1 = "A B C D" and > variant 2 = "A B D." They are all ways of getting from A to D. > > To put it another way, how would you handle a bus route with two operators > who use different service numbers and names for the same route? > > Creative abuse of the rules is fun. Ask any company using tax avoidance > schemes, like Google, Apple, etc. > > -- > Paul > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
