On 26.10.2018 16:24, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > Do you see the contradiction? If the crossing is unmarked, the ground > object already does not provide any guidance. As we map what's on the > ground, there is nothing to map.
It's not uncommon for a crossing to be physically evident on the ground (e.g. because of lowered kerbs) even if there are no painted markings. To me, that would be a typical example of an unmarked crossing. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
