You can do *exactly the same* with my new proposed values for intermittent=*
No need for a new key, I think. Cheers, Sergio On 2018-12-14 00:48, Warin wrote: > On 13/12/18 12:48, Sergio Manzi wrote: >> >> >> On 2018-12-13 02:36, Warin wrote: >>> At the moment developing a system to render seasonal values on requires a >>> determination on spring/summer/autumn/winter etc .. this would add some new >>> terms. Not too hard but does add to things. >> >> Also developing a system to render the ephemeral key would add some >> complexity, probably more... >> >>> Not certain about ephemeral being subservient to intermittent. >> >> If it is not there all of the time, than it is intermittent. >> >> If it doesn't last long, than it is ephemeral (/but then it is not there all >> of the time and thus it is intermittent too/). >> > > The primary motivation for me is that a water feature with intermittent is > more likely to have water, even it I have to dig a meter or two for it, than > a water feature with ephemeral. > > I don't expect a 'normal' map will tell me this. But a desert map should. > > I would map the ephemeral river banks/courses. > But then the places where water pools to form more permanent water sources I > would as natural=water, intermittent=yes. In this way they can be > distinguished as a more probable source of water. > Some satellite imagery shows these .. but then some shows the area just after > rain! So it requires some judgements. > > I'll add this as a rationale ... > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
