Peter: " Mapping a trailhead node as I suggested does not stand in the way of more complex options. My idea: begin with the simplest common element which supports all the other options. "
+1 On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:13 PM Peter Elderson <[email protected]> wrote: > Sometimes it would, sometimes it would not. If the node actually > represents the start of the trail, it is already in the relation because it > is part of the way that belongs to the route. In the situation that a > trailhead node represents a named cluster of helpful facilities/amenities > in the vicinity of several trails or networks, you wouldn't want to add it > to all the relations, because a. it's not actually part of the routes and > b. maintenance of all the routes would be quite error-prone and not really > intuitive. > > A site relation has been suggested for the more complex trailheads. You > would include the node there, the parking(s), the information booth or > guide stands, maybe PT-stops, possibly the route relations you can access > from the site... > > Mapping a trailhead node as I suggested does not stand in the way of more > complex options. My idea: begin with the simplest common element which > supports all the other options. > > Op wo 2 jan. 2019 om 12:04 schreef Tobias Wrede <[email protected]>: > >> Wouldn't it make sense to add the trail head (node) to a route relation >> with role=trail_head? >> >> Am 01.01.2019 um 12:54 schrieb Peter Elderson: >> > At this point, I settle for just requiring that it's a named location >> > visibly designated as access point for one ore more recreational routes. >> > >> > So just a node tagged highway=trailhead and name=<Name of the >> trailhead>. >> > >> > Which node? Well, if it's just the start with a name on a guidepost, >> > use the guidepost node. If it's an information board with the name, >> > use that. If there is a flagpole or a stele or say a statue of the >> > pioneer who walked it first, use that. If there is none of that, use >> > the location which presents itself naturally as a starrting point when >> > you get there. If there is no such location, then it's not a trailhead! >> > >> > Anything else: optional, map and tag as seems appropriate. >> > >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > -- > Vr gr Peter Elderson > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Dave Swarthout Homer, Alaska Chiang Mai, Thailand Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
