I agree. That is not suggested. Op wo 2 jan. 2019 om 19:05 schreef Jo <[email protected]>:
> Please don't add public transport stops to hiking route relations. That > would be really confusing. > > Polyglot > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM Dave Swarthout <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Peter: " Mapping a trailhead node as I suggested does not stand in the >> way of more complex options. My idea: begin with the simplest common >> element which supports all the other options. " >> >> +1 >> >> On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:13 PM Peter Elderson <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Sometimes it would, sometimes it would not. If the node actually >>> represents the start of the trail, it is already in the relation because it >>> is part of the way that belongs to the route. In the situation that a >>> trailhead node represents a named cluster of helpful facilities/amenities >>> in the vicinity of several trails or networks, you wouldn't want to add it >>> to all the relations, because a. it's not actually part of the routes and >>> b. maintenance of all the routes would be quite error-prone and not really >>> intuitive. >>> >>> A site relation has been suggested for the more complex trailheads. You >>> would include the node there, the parking(s), the information booth or >>> guide stands, maybe PT-stops, possibly the route relations you can access >>> from the site... >>> >>> Mapping a trailhead node as I suggested does not stand in the way of >>> more complex options. My idea: begin with the simplest common element which >>> supports all the other options. >>> >>> Op wo 2 jan. 2019 om 12:04 schreef Tobias Wrede <[email protected]>: >>> >>>> Wouldn't it make sense to add the trail head (node) to a route relation >>>> with role=trail_head? >>>> >>>> Am 01.01.2019 um 12:54 schrieb Peter Elderson: >>>> > At this point, I settle for just requiring that it's a named location >>>> > visibly designated as access point for one ore more recreational >>>> routes. >>>> > >>>> > So just a node tagged highway=trailhead and name=<Name of the >>>> trailhead>. >>>> > >>>> > Which node? Well, if it's just the start with a name on a guidepost, >>>> > use the guidepost node. If it's an information board with the name, >>>> > use that. If there is a flagpole or a stele or say a statue of the >>>> > pioneer who walked it first, use that. If there is none of that, use >>>> > the location which presents itself naturally as a starrting point >>>> when >>>> > you get there. If there is no such location, then it's not a >>>> trailhead! >>>> > >>>> > Anything else: optional, map and tag as seems appropriate. >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Tagging mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Vr gr Peter Elderson >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> >> >> -- >> Dave Swarthout >> Homer, Alaska >> Chiang Mai, Thailand >> Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > -- Vr gr Peter Elderson
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
