Please don't add public transport stops to hiking route relations. That would be really confusing.
Polyglot On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 2:39 PM Dave Swarthout <[email protected]> wrote: > Peter: " Mapping a trailhead node as I suggested does not stand in the way > of more complex options. My idea: begin with the simplest common element > which supports all the other options. " > > +1 > > On Wed, Jan 2, 2019 at 8:13 PM Peter Elderson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Sometimes it would, sometimes it would not. If the node actually >> represents the start of the trail, it is already in the relation because it >> is part of the way that belongs to the route. In the situation that a >> trailhead node represents a named cluster of helpful facilities/amenities >> in the vicinity of several trails or networks, you wouldn't want to add it >> to all the relations, because a. it's not actually part of the routes and >> b. maintenance of all the routes would be quite error-prone and not really >> intuitive. >> >> A site relation has been suggested for the more complex trailheads. You >> would include the node there, the parking(s), the information booth or >> guide stands, maybe PT-stops, possibly the route relations you can access >> from the site... >> >> Mapping a trailhead node as I suggested does not stand in the way of more >> complex options. My idea: begin with the simplest common element which >> supports all the other options. >> >> Op wo 2 jan. 2019 om 12:04 schreef Tobias Wrede <[email protected]>: >> >>> Wouldn't it make sense to add the trail head (node) to a route relation >>> with role=trail_head? >>> >>> Am 01.01.2019 um 12:54 schrieb Peter Elderson: >>> > At this point, I settle for just requiring that it's a named location >>> > visibly designated as access point for one ore more recreational >>> routes. >>> > >>> > So just a node tagged highway=trailhead and name=<Name of the >>> trailhead>. >>> > >>> > Which node? Well, if it's just the start with a name on a guidepost, >>> > use the guidepost node. If it's an information board with the name, >>> > use that. If there is a flagpole or a stele or say a statue of the >>> > pioneer who walked it first, use that. If there is none of that, use >>> > the location which presents itself naturally as a starrting point when >>> > you get there. If there is no such location, then it's not a trailhead! >>> > >>> > Anything else: optional, map and tag as seems appropriate. >>> > >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Tagging mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >>> >> >> >> -- >> Vr gr Peter Elderson >> _______________________________________________ >> Tagging mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >> > > > -- > Dave Swarthout > Homer, Alaska > Chiang Mai, Thailand > Travel Blog at http://dswarthout.blogspot.com > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
