On Thu, 7 Feb 2019 at 22:16, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: Humm document that it is not known what it is, that the original mappers > fail to respond? >
That too. But mainly document that the general consensus is that it is best handled by a multipolygon with a naked area playing the inner role. That's not only clearer, using accepted and documented tagging, but it also renders. As opposed to landuse=clearing which doesn't render and a clearing isn't a use of land but a lack of use of land. It would be good to document it so that those who find landuse=clearing on taginfo and bother to then check the wiki for acceptability will see there's a better way to do it. Assuming we all did agree that was a better way to do it (it was so many long discussions ago, I forget the outcome). -- Paul
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
