On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 10:49 AM Dave Swarthout <daveswarth...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The seamark definition in the supplied link is very general. I cannot see how > anyone could misinterpret this use of either waterway=fairway or > seamark:type=fairway unless they are specialists, in which case I'm sure a > response will be forthcoming. Regardless, I agree that the conflict note > should be removed.
I've updated the wiki, please have a look and let me know if you disagree. [1] > I would love to see the tag waterway=fairway Well, the wiki says it is "de facto," I think it means it is already accepted. > but I also hope we can somehow make it applicable to canoe routes as well. From the definition of waterway=fairway, it can be used for the members of canoe routes as long as they are artificial and marked by buoys. I expect this to be rare though. The definition of route=canoe says it should be used only in relations, but I think it may be comparable to route=ferry, which is allowed both in relations and in ways (I believe this is to make rendering ferry routes easier). It seems that specialized maps already render route=canoe relations [2]. Regards, [1] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Template%3AGeneric%3AMap_Features%3Awaterway&type=revision&diff=1790679&oldid=1787712 [2] https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route%3Dcanoe#Rendering -- Fernando Trebien _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
