Hi! On 2019-03-05 11:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Mar 5, 2019, 9:00 AM by [email protected]: > > Typically a small areas in the city between apartment buildings. These > areas are not official parks, gardens or grass. It is just a green accessible > for everoyne. So we can say it is a *public* or *common* green. > > So far I usually tagged such places as follows: > > Made sure that it is within landuse=residential (as it is a residential area) > Mapped physical features (leisure=playground, natural=tree, landuse=grass, > highway=footway etc)
Is it land*use*=grass or land*cover*=grass? I tend to agree with Alessandro Sarretta who uses landcover... I also have doubts about leisure=playground as it is not a physical feature but it describe the usage done of that space, not its characteristics. Also that very same space could be used for different things (/fairs, concerts, rallies, etc./) at different times... TBH I don't have an answer to the problem, but I tend to agree that we should, A) describe the physical characteristics of the place, and, B) describe the fact that the place is of public interest... > Maybe one may also add access tag to landuse=residential to tag it as a > public? > AFAIK this is not commonly done at this moment, but I see nothing wrong with > it. Sergio
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
