Sorry, my answer was meant to regard the "common replacement" (topic of the thread) more than the situation described by Marián for which "playground" is probably OK...
On 2019-03-05 11:48, Sergio Manzi wrote: > > Hi! > > On 2019-03-05 11:13, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> >> Mar 5, 2019, 9:00 AM by [email protected]: >> >> Typically a small areas in the city between apartment buildings. These >> areas are not official parks, gardens or grass. It is just a green >> accessible for everoyne. So we can say it is a *public* or *common* green. >> >> So far I usually tagged such places as follows: >> >> Made sure that it is within landuse=residential (as it is a residential area) >> Mapped physical features (leisure=playground, natural=tree, landuse=grass, >> highway=footway etc) > > Is it land*use*=grass or land*cover*=grass? I tend to agree with Alessandro > Sarretta who uses landcover... > > I also have doubts about leisure=playground as it is not a physical feature > but it describe the usage done of that space, not its characteristics. Also > that very same space could be used for different things (/fairs, concerts, > rallies, etc./) at different times... > > TBH I don't have an answer to the problem, but I tend to agree that we > should, A) describe the physical characteristics of the place, and, B) > describe the fact that the place is of public interest... > > >> Maybe one may also add access tag to landuse=residential to tag it as a >> public? >> AFAIK this is not commonly done at this moment, but I see nothing wrong with >> it. > > Sergio >
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
