Oh, and how exactly do you explain, that it never ever appeared in the tag description for cycleway:left and cycleway:right ?
Even on Bicycle wiki page, these were _red_ links, while all the other stuff had neatly been linked to existing and valid tag descriptions. The meaning of it has never been documented on the wiki and only recently been derived based on live data. The tag recommendation on the Bicycle wiki page is limited to pair with imagery to discriminate the intended use by example and fails to give a proper description. In practice mappers had to imply that the meaning ought to be somehow, in an obscure way, similar to the description that is present for cycleway=, the unaffixed variant. Red links, no proper documentation, and a usage you need to guess solely on limited examples, additionally limited to right hand traffic system only are a lot of facts to conclude that this part of the doc has been (and is) dubious, or more loosely _meaningless_. Sorry, but "completely untrue" is different. Regards, cmuelle8 > On Mar 15, 2019, 09:09 Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > Claim that opposite_lane is a value that has no meaning with cycleway:left > that appeared on Wiki (in edit description) is completely untrue. _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
