On 19/03/19 10:26, Paul Allen wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 23:18, Graeme Fitzpatrick
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Mon, 18 Mar 2019 at 20:34, Lorenzo Stucchi
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Since no more doubts were presented
I'm sorry, but I think every post in reply to your proposal has
raised doubts,
+ 1
Except I'd have said they were serious doubts, along the lines of
"DON'T DO THAT!"
But let him put it to a vote, if he wants to. It will be amusing.
Not amusing.
'We' should be encouraging .. good if not better tagging.
For the deforestation project OSM could be usefull. But there needs to
be some acceptance that OSM information is more detailed that what is
wanted so there will need to be some adjustments on the project side to
accept and make contributions to OSM data. If that is too much work load
then simply taking OSM data and making their own data base might be
there way forward.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
