Hi, I said the its interesting also to known what there is the area without trees. I don’t thinks that make sense to tag this as an area without trees but with a tag that specify what there is in this area.
Yes I remember about the fact of the key natural. Best, Lorenzo > Il giorno 20 mar 2019, alle ore 09:25, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> ha > scritto: > > On 20/03/19 18:54, Lorenzo Stucchi wrote: > >> Hi Giovanni, >> >> We thinks that it also important understand if the area is without >> vegetation because becomes a cultivated land, an artificial area or the >> trees are just cutted for wood and so some year after they will appear >> again. For this reason we thinks that is interesting to understand also what >> there is in the are without trees. >> > An area without trees will not have a tag for trees. An area that is not > mapped will look like there are no trees. > > Map the trees and you then know both the area of trees and the area without > trees. You do not need a special tag to say there are no trees. > > PS the OSM key 'natural' applies to both 'natural' and 'unnatural' areas! > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:natural > > key 'natural' OSM definition: "Used to describe natural physical land > features, including ones that have been modified by humans." > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
