I agree that "camp_site=camp_pitch" isn't a perfect tag name, but it's been used so often that I don't think it's worth changing. It's already supported with a preset in ID as well.
As mentioned in the older version of the proposal, the value is "camp_pitch" to avoid ambiguity with sporting pitches or fields. The key "camp_site" was probably used to show that is needs to be a feature of a tourism-camp_site (or caravan_site). In this way it is similar to "allotments=plot", which is used to show an individual garden plot for one family, within a larger area of landuse=allotments/ If "tourism=camp_pitch" or "amenity=camp_pitch" were used, it might be confused with a stand-alone campsite. Joseph On 4/12/19, Sven Geggus <[email protected]> wrote: > Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > >> I’m fine with mapping individual pitches, but I don’t like the key. >> “camp_site=*” sounds like a tag for the subtype of a camp site rather than >> a different feature within such a site. > > Unfortunately its currently used for both. > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:camp_site > > Not particular nice, but not that bad either. Changing this tag to something > else would need automatic editing of 6941 objects. > > As I already said that I object the camp_pitch prefixing for subtags. > > Looking at them I also suggest to use the already established tags > "power_supply" and "fireplace" instead of "camp_pitch:fire" and > "camp_pitch:electric". > > Regards > > Sven > > -- > Um Kontrolle Ihres Kontos wiederzugewinnen, klicken Sie bitte auf das > Verbindungsgebrüll. (aus einer Ebay fishing Mail) > > /me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
