sent from a phone
> On 14. Apr 2019, at 18:36, marc marc <[email protected]> wrote: > > one of the problems is that each key has its own logic > a part of a amenity=building is building:part=* > a part of the amenity=parking is amenity=parking_space > a part of a leisure=sports_centre is leisure=pitch unless it is water > then it is leisure=swimming_pool > > new keys deserve to have some consistency. > e.g. :part if the part does not have a name in itself I don’t follow this, a part of a park is a park:part (bench, tree etc)? A part of a city? This would be ridiculous or ambiguous or arbitrary most of the time, but for buildings it works well, also if the part has its own name. Cheers, Martin _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
