sent from a phone
> On 14. Apr 2019, at 15:46, Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > By using a different key, like "camp_site=*", this is more clearly a > "sub-feature" of tourism=camp_site IMHO the tag indicates a subtype of camp site, rather than a feature. I am not opposing a new key, but why “site”? E.g. camping=pitch or camp=pitch There are already types of camping sites tagged with the camp_site key: https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/camp_site#values admittedly fewer than camp_site=camp_pitch There is also noteworthy usage of camp_pitch:type https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/camp_pitch%3Atype Camping pitches could become their own key: camp_pitch=motorhome / tent / see taginfo for camp_pitch:type=* is it camp_pitch or would camping_pitch be better? Ciao, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
