On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 at 22:39, Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> I was considering making a proposal for natural=mountain_range, but > this tag is already in use over 603 times by over 84 different mappers > (for the nodes and ways; I didn't download relations). So I've made a > wiki page to describe the current use. > > But if there are people who would prefer I make a proposal page and > redirect to that, I can do this instead. > Good on you, Joseph. I'd agree that seeing it is already in wide=spread use, it shouldn't need a proposal, then voting. > I've tried to recommend mapping as a node in most cases, or a linear > way when this can be done a reasonable way, by following natural=ridge > lines to connect the main natural=peak and natural=saddle points of > the mountain range. One question though, please. You've suggested that when drawing a way that "The way should not cross streams, rivers or valleys". How then do you handle gaps in the range? eg Main Range stretches from here, south to there, & is crossed here by Cunningham's Gap, which includes the east-west highway. Split the way, so that the range is shown each side of the gap? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
