On Mon, 29 Apr 2019 at 08:09, Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> Yes, make 2 separate ways. > Thanks! > I think it’s reasonable to map a mountain range as a linear way when this > can follow a continuous series of ridge crests. But a mountain range that > is split in 2 by a valley should be considered 2 local features that share > a name. > Yep, makes sense. > For this reason, large and complex mountains ranges, like the Rocky > Mountains, cannot be mapped as a single linear or area feature: they > consist of many smaller ranges which spread over a wide area, with vague > boundaries. > It's not mapping the entire range as such, but would is_in work here? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:is%20in?uselang=en-AU natural=mountain_range name=Main Range is_in=Great Dividing Range Thoughts? Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
