Helo everyone. I would like to pick up this month old discussion again and try to come to a conclussion.
The situation so far: Problem: There are signposted hiking and biking routes, where the route itself goes only one way, because it's not way-marked in the opposite direction. How do we add that information in OSM? Current solution: oneway=yes. Not preferred by many on this list, as oneway should indicate a legal restriction. New solution: Some of you suggested alternative new tags, but we didn't come to a conclusion on this yet. What I have gathered from the various answers: - bidirectional=no - signed_oneway=yes - signed_direction=yes - designated_direction=forward|both|backward - signed=forward|backward|both|none Personally, I like signed_direction=yes. It's simple and avoids using the word oneway. Also, using the value forward|backward might not be necessary, as it's possible to deduce this from the order of ways in the relation. Any other views? Anybody against replacing oneway=yes with signed_direction=yes in the wiki pages of route=foot and route=hiking? On Tue, 19 Mar 2019 09:37:35 +0000, marc marc <[email protected]> wrote: > Le 19.03.19 à 10:05, marc marc a écrit : > > Le 19.03.19 à 09:37, Markus a écrit : > >> what about signed_direction=*? > > > > signed:forward|backward|both|none ? > > oups typo > signed=forward|backward|both|none ? > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
