It is indeed interesting to store that the signs work only for one
direction,
therefore oneway=yes/no is documented for hiking routes
- in https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking#Tags_of_the_relation
since Jan. 2013
- in
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:route=hiking#Tags_of_the_relation since
Mar. 2016
and we already have 1.2k relations with oneway=yes
and zero with oneway=signed, bidirectional=no or signed_oneway=yes.
On 14.03.2019 21:31, Volker Schmidt wrote:
> I second Martin. No "oneway" key in this case.
> On Thu, 14 Mar 2019 at 21:18, Martin Koppenhoefer
<[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>
> sent from a phone
>
> > On 14. Mar 2019, at 11:43, Sarah Hoffmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > or oneway=signed if you think it clashes with the legal
> > restriction tags).
>
>
> or bidirectional=no
> or signed_oneway=yes
>
> it shouldn’t be a value of the “oneway” key, there’s nothing
preventing you from doing the route in the counterdirection, especially
if you are with a map from OpenStreetMap ;-)
>
> Yes, it could be interesting to store that the signs work only
for one direction, but this is very different from a oneway.
>
>
> Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
