On Sun, 2019-05-12 at 00:10 +0900, 石野貴之 wrote: > Hello. > > > 2019年5月11日(土) 5:30 bkil <[email protected]>: > > I've read in the previous rejection comments that many opposed to > > > > putting brand details in keys. What do you think about this > > version: > > > > prepaid_top_up:mobile=yes/<brands>. The reason is that around here, > > > > you could top up your mobile phone either at the given carrier, > > kiosks > > > > over generic online charging or at given supermarket chains > > > > (supporting fixed subsets of carriers). We could easily map such > > > > detail when importing the given supermarket chain's data. We have > > > > already raised this question during previous imports before this > > > > proposal was started. > > > > > > I'm in favor for your idea of putting brand details. The reason is > mainly because: > > 【There should be consistency between prepaid_top_up tag and payment > tag.】 > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:payment > > For example, there are many kinds of public_transport cards in the > world and payment:* tag supports them. (icsf cards like Suica in > Japan, Oyster card in the UK, T-money card in Korea and so on.) A tag > like prepaid_top_up:public_transport=yes is insufficient, We cannot > use Oyster card in Japan! Where you can use Suica, there should be > top_up machines for it. You can't use an Oyster card in most of the UK either, and I assume you cannot top one up outside London either.
I would assume that the key public_transport_cards will indicate that I can top-up the local operators cards, here in The Shire I would expect it to mean I can top up an Arriva bus card, I would expect a very glazed look if I tried to top-up (my now obsolete) Oyster card in the local shop. Phil (trigpoint)
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
