On Tue, 4 Jun 2019 at 09:55, Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 2) Irrigation=yes > > With this tag, it would be possible to also use "drainage=yes", so a > canal used for both drainage and irrigation could be "waterway=canal" > + "irrigation=yes" + "drainage=yes" - this leads to using an extra > tag, but doesn't require any semicolon-separated values. > > > I originally started writing a proposal for "usage=irrigation" and > "usage=drainage", but when I checked the details, I realized that > "irrigation=yes" and "drainage=yes" might be more likely to be > approved. > That it was I was also thinking waterway=canal / drain / ditch navigation=yes/no irrigation=yes/no drainage=yes/no KISS! > To me either tag would be preferred over service=irrigation, so I > agree with deprecating it, once we get an alternative approved. > Yep, usage=irrigation is much nicer than service= Thanks Graeme
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
