If you look at it from a temporary residence for the group of people perspective, then I guess tags like place=village/town/neighbourhood could be better choices?
在 2019年6月10日週一 20:18，Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> 寫道： > I understand why refugee camps have been mapped with > amenity=social_facility - it's the closest existing tag, since > tourism=camp_site is clearly wrong and landuse=residential isn't quite > right. > > However, I don't think that large refugee camps are a perfect fit for > amenity=social_facility. > > Most of these are group homes (eg orphanages), nursing homes (for the > elderly), hospices, assisted living facilities, homeless shelters, > outreach facilities for the homelss, etc - they provide services for > vulnerable groups in the community who have difficulty living on their > own. > > Refugee camps are closer to an informal residential settlement in many > developing countries, especially those that are larger or have been in > place for more than a few months (these are the ones most likely to be > mapped, I believe). > > I would encourage creating a proposal and a new tag specifically for > these sorts of places. There could perhaps be a distinction between > sites for people temporarily displaced locally (eg a camp for people > in the same town, after a flood) versus long-distance or international > migrants. > > On 6/10/19, Jan S <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> On 6/6/2019 5:27 PM, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > >> >>* I'd suggest something like social_facility=temporary_housing. > >> *>>>* To me, social_facility doesn't quite cut it for "refugees". > >> Refugees > >> *>* strike me as people fleeing from war / massive natural disaster - > >> *>* social_facility comes across as small scale for homeless people / > >> *>* women's refuge sort of thing? > >> *>>Browsing through the values of social_facility:for, it's a lot more > >> diverse than just victims of abuse and poverty -- and > >> social_facility:for=refugee(s) has hundreds of uses. But you definitely > >> have a point about scale -- some of these camps house over a hundred > >> thousand people. That's on the scale of a small city -- a community, not > >> a facility. So maybe place=refugee_camp is a better solution. > >> > >> J > >> > >> > > Picking up the subject again (and having noticed that the refugee camps I > > know in my area are not tagged at all or at least very rudimentary simply > > as amenity=social_facility), I've done another search on the internet and > > have dug up this wiki page: > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Refugee_Camp_Mapping > > > > It's been modified in 2018 for the last time, is quite rudimentary in the > > description of the tags and values proposed and apparently oriented > mainly > > at makeshift camps in Africa or the Levante. It would be an effort to > bring > > some order into this and to make it more diverse (covering anything from > > spontaneous camps like the infamous Jungle in Calais or the already > > dismantled Idomeini camp, to permanent structures like asylum-seeker > > reception centres like this: https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/390153052 > ). > > > > I'll see if I can give it a try over the next weeks... or would that be a > > task for a coordinated action? > > > > Best, Jan > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
