Here's one,
https://www.dropbox.com/s/agj4njek1r35vnz/2018-10-03-13.06.54r.jpg?dl=0
Maybe gets some maintenance every 10 or 20 years or so. It is probably
never soft, so it doesn't fit any tracktype definition. It is still used
for a couple of mines (worked by 1 or 2 people), but mostly
recreational use. This is higher altitude than most, but not unusual
in the western US.
I think tracktype as specified is only useful for a small portion of the
world. Useful for flat, wet regions.
On 7/2/19 11:02 PM, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
...
2) Take the leading sentence mentioning Solid/Soft out of the
tracktype description (or de-emphasize it)
I am dubious about redefining extremely
popular tags. For start - can you link
some photos of places where current
definition is a problem?
The best would be photos on licenses
allowing upload to OSM Wiki or
Wikimedia Commons.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
