On 12/07/19 21:00, Florian Lohoff wrote:
On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:23:01AM +0200, Pee Wee wrote:
Hi all
I would like your opinion on the next issue.
meaning on may 3, 2010 when someone added a description of “Garden” from
the Wikipedia garden description that refers to private gardens. In order
to differentiate from the publicly accessible gardens (with or without fee)
sometime additional tags like “access=private” and
“garden:type=residential” are added. To me this seems better then no
additional tags at all but in fact I think private gardens (not accessible)
should not be tagged with the leisure key. On the talk page I saw that
there are more objections
For me a leisure=* in OSM has some public usability assumption. Mapping
every little green strip as a leisure=garden i would consider a tagging
abuse.
Some private gardens that front the street are publicly visible, I see no
reason not to map them.
The 'usability' in this instance is visible and, sometimes,scents.
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
