On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:23:01AM +0200, Pee Wee wrote: > Hi all > I would like your opinion on the next issue.
> meaning on may 3, 2010 when someone added a description of “Garden” from
> the Wikipedia garden description that refers to private gardens. In order
> to differentiate from the publicly accessible gardens (with or without fee)
> sometime additional tags like “access=private” and
> “garden:type=residential” are added. To me this seems better then no
> additional tags at all but in fact I think private gardens (not accessible)
> should not be tagged with the leisure key. On the talk page I saw that
> there are more objections
For me a leisure=* in OSM has some public usability assumption. Mapping
every little green strip as a leisure=garden i would consider a tagging
abuse.
Flo
--
Florian Lohoff f...@zz.de
UTF-8 Test: The 🐈 ran after a 🐁, but the 🐁 ran away
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
