I have tagged many planted centre pieces of roundabouts as leisure=garden, access=private in lack of better alternatives.
On Sat, 13 Jul 2019, 02:18 Warin, <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 12/07/19 21:00, Florian Lohoff wrote: > > On Fri, Jul 12, 2019 at 07:23:01AM +0200, Pee Wee wrote: > >> Hi all > >> I would like your opinion on the next issue. > >> meaning on may 3, 2010 when someone added a description of “Garden” from > >> the Wikipedia garden description that refers to private gardens. In > order > >> to differentiate from the publicly accessible gardens (with or without > fee) > >> sometime additional tags like “access=private” and > >> “garden:type=residential” are added. To me this seems better then no > >> additional tags at all but in fact I think private gardens (not > accessible) > >> should not be tagged with the leisure key. On the talk page I saw that > >> there are more objections > > For me a leisure=* in OSM has some public usability assumption. Mapping > > every little green strip as a leisure=garden i would consider a tagging > > abuse. > > Some private gardens that front the street are publicly visible, I see no > reason not to map them. > > The 'usability' in this instance is visible and, sometimes,scents. > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
