That would be for the Australian mapping community to decide, to document and to implement.
Mvg Peter Elderson > Op 11 aug. 2019 om 23:08 heeft Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > > >> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 05:04, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote: >>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:35 PM Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I'm sure the hierarchy >>> trunk/primary/secondary/tertiary/<something_else>/residential with a side >>> of service types is general enough that all countries can map their own >>> system to it. I feel no need to force any country's own system upon any >>> other country, or to make it the same all over the world. >> >> I largely agree. I wouldn't mind country-specific values similar to the >> advantage that the UK has on this as previously stated, then let the wiki >> work out what counts as largely equivalent in character for the renderers to >> work with. I feel like that would help a lot on the front and back end of >> it. > > So how do you go about setting country-specific values? > > In Australia, it's not uncommon for a Primary (& in some cases, Trunk!) road > to be a single lane dirt road!, & it would be nice to be able to show them > with the importance that they are to local residents of that area. > > Is it simply a matter of specifying road types under the "Australia" page & > hoping that people read them? > > Thanks > > Graeme > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging