That would be for the Australian mapping community to decide, to document and 
to implement.

Mvg Peter Elderson

> Op 11 aug. 2019 om 23:08 heeft Graeme Fitzpatrick <graemefi...@gmail.com> het 
> volgende geschreven:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 at 05:04, Paul Johnson <ba...@ursamundi.org> wrote:
>>> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 1:35 PM Peter Elderson <pelder...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> I'm sure the hierarchy 
>>> trunk/primary/secondary/tertiary/<something_else>/residential with a side 
>>> of service types is general enough that all countries can map their own 
>>> system to it. I feel no need to force any country's own system upon any 
>>> other country, or to make it the same all over the world. 
>> 
>> I largely agree.  I wouldn't mind country-specific values similar to the 
>> advantage that the UK has on this as previously stated, then let the wiki 
>> work out what counts as largely equivalent in character for the renderers to 
>> work with.  I feel like that would help a lot on the front and back end of 
>> it.
> 
> So how do you go about setting country-specific values?
> 
> In Australia, it's not uncommon for a Primary (& in some cases, Trunk!) road 
> to be a single lane dirt road!, & it would be nice to be able to show them 
> with the importance that they are to local residents of that area.  
> 
> Is it simply a matter of specifying road types under the "Australia" page & 
> hoping that people read them?
> 
> Thanks
> 
> Graeme
> _______________________________________________
> Tagging mailing list
> Tagging@openstreetmap.org
> https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Reply via email to