On Sun, 18 Aug 2019 at 18:26, Richard Fairhurst <rich...@systemed.net> wrote:
> I'd fully agree on roles. The use of 'alternate' and 'forward'/'reverse' > roles for bike route relations dates back to the earliest days of bike > route > mapping in OSM and is well established by now. > I suppose this is a typo: It should be 'forward'/'backward' and not 'forward'/'reverse' (see the wiki page: Cycle Routes <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cycle_routes>: "*Relation role*: Cycle routes sometimes have different paths depending on the direction you are travelling. In this case, ways in the relation should have a role of *forward* or *backward* as described in Relation:route#Members <https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:route#Members>. The direction is rendered on the cycle map (example <https://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=51.88885&lon=0.8972&zoom=16&layers=C>)") Volker
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
