I would say it is a system of preferential cycleroutes to different destinations. It resembles the system of preferential truck routes in Amsterdam.
It is a system, and it's visible on the ground. The arrow signs create a route to the next signpost in the chosen direction. If there is agreement that this actually is something worth mapping, I don't see a problem there. The network:type=* tag creates the option to add network-systems for all transport modes. If a clear value for this network:type can be agreed upon, I see no problem there either. That's my own opinion. Since the Dutch route mappers came up with the network:type tag to explicitly map network systems (i.c. node_network), and since we have discussed how to tag a preference route system for trucks in Amsterdam last year, I will ask on the Dutch OSM forum how they feel about this idea. Fr gr Peter Elderson Op do 12 sep. 2019 om 00:04 schreef Hubert87 <[email protected]>: > Hi, > > i have stumbled over the post about rcn and cycling node networks and > was wondering if you guys might have a proposal for primary bicycle > route mesh network relation(s) like this one > https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/3585265, which is in Bremen, > Germany. > > It is neither a cycling node network nor a classical bicycle route but a > set of > guideposts(https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/AlXYW3arx59dkSlruUsWjg) > showing poi destinations and distances completed with addition smaller > signs (https://www.mapillary.com/map/im/9pqoiH4eH4o7Ieh6IXRnfg) in > between guideposts pointing in the right direction. > > All classical bicycle routes seem to be part of this network, but it > contains more routes. Additionally these routes do not have a beginning > or end or a closed loops, but are more a kind of mesh like the node > network; except for the nodes. > > Also, as far a I can tell, the main guidepost are sorted into 5 regions > (Nord, Süd, Ost, West, Mitte), which is coded in the small print > (mi=mitte) on the guideposts, as can be seen in the first example picture. > > There is a discussion in the german forum > (https://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=762131) about > deleting these relations and just tagging its highways with lcn=yes. > But I'd really looking for a different solution. > Can someone point me to a possible solution? > > Yours > Hubert87 > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
