On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, 22:42 Jan Michel, <[email protected]> wrote: > We do have a (recently approved) relation type for this: 'connectivity': > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relation:connectivity
Thank you, this is exactly what i was looking for! (Although, as you wrote, it doesn't seem necessary in this case.) On Fri, 6 Sep 2019, 22:07 Leif Rasmussen, <[email protected]> wrote: > I see two good options: > 1) Split the two lanes into two ways where they first split apart (but aren't yet physically divided). This doesn't follow the "physical divider" rule, but since the road markings are acting as a physical divider, and they are much more than just a line, an exception to that rule seems fine. IMO it's better to not make an exception. Otherwise sooner or later there will be no rule anymore. > I've been considering starting a proposal for mapping the widths of lane dividers recently, since there are many cases where they aren't just lines. Perhaps some tag like "width:dividers=0|0|4" or similar could work, where each number represents a divider between two lanes [...] I personally think something other than "|" should be used for dividers, so am looking for a better syntax. That seems fine – with vertical bars –, but i guess it should rather be dividers:width=* (instead of width:dividers=*). Besides, i think it shouldn't be 0 if lane dividers aren't absent (better e.g. 0.01|0.01|4). And it may not work well if the with of a divider increases or decreases, what is the case quite often (e.g. triangle with chevrons or diagonal bars). But maybe something like dividers:width:start=* dividers:width:end=* could be used if the increase is linear. Regards Markus
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
