Am Mo., 21. Okt. 2019 um 18:15 Uhr schrieb Tobias Knerr <o...@tobias-knerr.de >:
> Me too. As I see it, the core of the question comes down to whether the > OSM data model should put a pedestrian road section without a kerb in > the same general category as one with a kerb, or whether these should be > treated as separate concepts. > > To me, it makes more sense to consider them as roughly the same thing > and model the distinction with an additional tag. For most use cases, > data users can likely handle them very similarly, even though I > acknowledge that there may be exceptions (such as Markus's example of > navigation for blind users). For pedestrian safety this seems to be a serious compromise, likely not a situation where parents would like their children walking to school if avoidable. I'm not sure I would want these lanes to integrate seamlessly and automatically with existing pedestrian routing. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
