Everything. Again: I proposed the deprecation of "contact:phone" in first place which has failed because the major tagging community decided so.
Everything went logical according to my statement. In this row I try to propose the deprecation of "phone" and now you're saying to me that OSM does not do deprecations of well-used tags? While this statement is completely understandable I do not understand why the community was against deprecating "contact:phone", can you tell me that?
My statement: Two tags for the same purpose are not elegant and makes the use of OSM data harder.
Cheers
Sören Reinecke alias Valor Naram
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - (contact:phone)
From: Chris Hill
To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
CC:
On 04/12/2019 13:41, Sören Reinecke via Tagging wrote:
> This proposal is different. It's about deprecating the `phone` key.
>
>
OSM doesn't do deprecation of a well-used tag. It doesn't do
homogenisation for the sake of it. It doesn't do a new dressed-up vote
to get around a failed vote. You put it forward as a plan and it got
rejected. To simply reverse the polarity of the vote and call it a new
vote is a joke. Just let this go, please.
What part of 'No' don't you understand?
--
cheers
Chris Hill (chillly)
_______________________________________________
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
