To sum up, checkpoints and trailheads deserve to be mapped. Once they are features mapped and tagged as nodes, they can be rendered, searched and used as POIs. Questions: Is it useful to include them as node members in the hiking route relation(s) or is the spatial relationship enough? If included, do they need a member role? If so, would "checkpoint" and "trailhead" be acceptable and useful role values? Would it be acceptable/useful for mappers to include a node in a route relation with a "checkpoint" role without any tagging?
Fr gr Peter Elderson > __________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
