oneway=yes|no needs indeed be applicable to vehicles only, for very practical reasons: otherwise we would have a massive problem with all one-way streets without separately mapped sidewalks.
On Thu, 9 Jan 2020, 02:16 Jarek Piórkowski, <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, 8 Jan 2020 at 16:33, Mateusz Konieczny <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Although unusual, oneway on pedestrian highways (path, footway, track) is > > possible in some places. > > > > Cases of oneway pedestrian traffic includes some hiking trails, border > crossing, > > exit-only passages and more. > > > > How to tag this? > > Would just like to note that oneway=yes is established on > highway=steps (usually with conveying=yes, i.e., an escalator) to the > point where a major data consumer openstreetmap-carto supports it, > e.g. https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/367618960 > > Arguably escalators are a special case since unlike most footways > there is a mechanical component to them. However I would still be > interested in seeing any tagging for footways maintain at least some > consistency with it. > > If this is hugely problematic for data consumers I would not be > opposed to tagging like highway=footway + foot:backward=no, with > oneway=yes allowed as optional for human readability. > > --Jarek > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
