That argument isn't convincing In Openstreetmap the keys are arbitrary strings; "oneway:foot" is no more relate to oneway than "not_oneway" or "phoneway".
I don't believe anyone will be confused by a tag like oneway:foot=yes, but if you prefer, changing the order to foot:oneway=* makes it clear that this is not a "subtag" of "oneway=" somehow, but rather something about access for people on foot. - Joseph Eisenberg On 1/13/20, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > Am Mo., 13. Jan. 2020 um 12:36 Uhr schrieb Joseph Eisenberg < > [email protected]>: > >> I would prefer oneway:foot=yes or foot:oneway=yes - the meaning of >> this tag is obvios. >> >> "foot:backward=no" is not very intuitive. > > > > According to some contestants, the meaning isn't obvious, as there is the > contradiction of "oneway" never applying to pedestrians and having a subtag > which behaves as if it did? > Similar self-contradicting tag would be > > highway=path AND motorcar=yes > > (a path is too narrow for a motorcar, so even if you add motorcar=yes, it > will not be accessible, for physical reasons): > > Cheers > Martin > _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
