Hi Florimond, I can see your logic, even if I still prefer drinking_water:free. One more issue I see with drinking_water:fee.
If a cafe is tagged "drinking_water:fee=yes", it could lead people erroneously to believe that the tagged cafe sells water ? It could be that the café or ice cream parlour doesn't sell bottle in single-use PET bottles or have drinking quality water tap water. Best regards, Stuart On Tue, 21 Jan 2020 at 09:59, Florimond Berthoux < florimond.berth...@gmail.com> wrote: > Le lun. 20 janv. 2020 à 16:16, European Water Project > <europeanwaterproj...@gmail.com> a écrit : > > > > Dear Florimond, > > > > What seems preferable about drinking_water:free=<no/yes/customers> is > that it is a tag that offers a complete response . > > > > drinking_water:fee, necessitates a follow up qualification. If no, then > for whom if not for everyone ? If yes, then how much and is it the same fee > for customers and non-customers alike? > > No, for me these tags are equal > drinking_water:free=no <=> drinking_water:fee=yes > drinking_water:free=yes <=> drinking_water:fee=no > drinking_water:free=customers <=> drinking_water:fee=free_for_customers > > -- > Florimond Berthoux > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
