There are many things about the proposal process that seem a little odd and we could spend a lot of time debating them. I'd rather just concentrate on the question of parliamentary procedure.
On Thu, Feb 6, 2020 at 11:11 AM Joseph Eisenberg <[email protected]> wrote: > > But hypothetically, what if there were even more comments expressing > reservations. This time it was over 25%, but what if it was 40% or > even 50%? > Doesn't matter, even if there were thousands of comments they still aren't votes. > Since the idea of this process is to reach consensus about a tag, > shouldn't critical comments be addressed by those voting "yes"? > > Well this is one of those odd things. There is a RFC period, where people are invited to...well..make comments. Once this is done it goes to a vote where we invite people to vote or make comments...hang on didn't we just have a RFC period? Isn't it too late to be asking for comments? What is the proponent (before we even start worrying about the yes voters) supposed to do with these now? You can't change a proposal part way through the voting period. How "critical" is a comment from a user that wasn't concerned enough to vote no?
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
