Am Do., 16. Apr. 2020 um 12:48 Uhr schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>:
> On 16/4/20 7:59 pm, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > sent from a phone > > > On 16. Apr 2020, at 05:04, Joseph Eisenberg <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> > <joseph.eisenb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Some paths and footways have oneway=yes. Sometimes this means that > bicycles may only access these features in one direction, but other > times it has been used for one-way features for pedestrians (for > example, queues in theme parks or at border control stations). > > it may have been used to intend applicability to pedestrians, but the wiki > was always clear on this: oneway is about restrictions for vehicles and does > not apply to pedestrians. There are 15 million oneway tags in the db, of > these just a tiny fraction was intended to apply to pedestrians, almost all > were intended not to apply to pedestrians. Let’s fix the erratic ones and > move on. > > > What reason is there for excluding other modes of transport? > > the reason is legislation. Oneway as defined in law is applying only to vehicular traffic. > If "oneway" cannot be used then what do you think should be used? > > direction dependent access tags. Cheers, Martin
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
