在 2020年5月10日週日 16:24，Martin Koppenhoefer <dieterdre...@gmail.com> 寫道：
> > > sent from a phone > > > On 10. May 2020, at 01:31, Paul Allen <pla16...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > If you use amenity=taxi + vehicle=* you > > guarantee that any carto which renders amenity=taxi will render ojek > ranks > > incorrectly at first, and perhaps incorrectly for all time (if they > decide they're > > going to ignore the vehicle tag) > > > it would only be “incorrectly” if you judged motorcycle taxis as not being > taxis. In this case, you should not tag them amenity=taxi taxi=motorcycle > anyway (because if taxi=motorcycle does not describe a subclass of taxi > this is the wrong approach anyway). > > In this discussion it appeared that some mappers see motorcycle taxis as a > kind of taxi, like boat taxis and helicopter taxis, and others that see > them as their own kind of service. > I saw one mapper who shared their view on why motorcycle taxi should be a type of taxi, unfortunately I cannot see the rationale within the explanation given by the editor. I think it would be helpful of the proposal can be modofied and RFC be restarted so that hopefully other editors who held similar views can provide a more easy to understand explanation on why they think so. >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
