Please use full tagging and don't create implicit values after the fact. We do have the width or est_width tags,tets use them, where they are needed.
On Thu, 21 May 2020 at 21:35, Mateusz Konieczny via Tagging < tagging@openstreetmap.org> wrote: > > > > May 21, 2020, 19:20 by miketh...@gmail.com: > > So are we saying highway=path/cycleway/footway implies width<3 (or some > similar value)? > > Yes, but it may be larger. Especially busy cycleway, or cycleway on curve, > or cycleway > on a slope may be noticeably larger. > > There is also an old problem how large footway should be to qualify as a > pedestrian road, > with varied opinions. > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > Tagging@openstreetmap.org > https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
