May 27, 2020, 15:12 by fernando.treb...@gmail.com: > I went back to this edit [1] before the wiki was changed recently. > Back then, bicycle=no was simply defined as "where bicycles are not > permitted." If nothing else is said, then nobody can conclude that > "riding bicycles is not permitted but carrying/pushing is," it said > "bicycles." > Yes, I agree that my edit changed definition of bicycle=no on the wiki.
I did it because I am pretty sure that it matches real usage. Checking bicycle=no vs bicycle=dismount usage, lack of support for bicycle=dismount in JOSM etc confirmed this to me. > This has been pointed out before. [2][3] In the same > table, a distinction is made for values such as bicycle=use_sidepath > and bicycle=dismount. > bicycle=use_sidepath is far more likely to be correct because people using bicycle=use_sidepath are likely to understand purpose of this vale While people using bicycle=no may be utterly unaware that bicycle=dismount and its planned differences exists > That said, I do not oppose changes to clarify this situation. > I really hope that my changes actually match how people map. I am pretty sure about that, but I welcome any comments of whatever it was a good idea or not.
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
